The collapse of discipleship without the collapse of belief
Table of Contents
It seems that many sincere Christians trust Jesus with eternity, yet hesitate to trust His way in the ordinary pressures of life. I could be wrong of course, but it does seem like that would be a fair statement to make.
Belief remains orthodox. Doctrine remains clear. And yet confidence that the life Jesus describes is genuinely good, wise, and sustainable in the real world often feels thin. I know I’ve struggled with this personally, and if I’m honest, I still do.
Obedience can feel costly but uncertain.
Discipleship can feel earnest but exhausting.
Church can feel true, but strangely weightless.
The more I learn, the more I read thinkers that have come before me, the more I think that this does not appear to be a crisis of belief.
It seems to be a crisis of formation.
A disconnection worth examining
It seems worth asking how belief has remained strong while lived confidence has weakened. Why is that? We have more access to sound biblical teaching than anytime in human history. Yes, access to some not so biblical teachers as well, but the point is that this crisis doesn’t seem to be an issue of a lack of knowledge.
Why do so many of us know Jesus’ teachings well, yet instinctively rely on other strategies when life becomes stressful or complex? Why does trust in Jesus often feel firm at the level of confession, but fragile at the level of instinct?
Psychologist Todd Hall, in Relational Spirituality, offers language that helps clarify this tension. He distinguishes between explicit knowledge and implicit knowledge.
Explicit knowledge is conscious, verbal, and propositional. It includes doctrine, theology, and articulated belief. By this measure, many Christians are well formed.
Implicit knowledge is pre-reflective, emotional, embodied, and relational. It is shaped through attachment, story, repeated experience, and what has proven reliable under pressure.
What if the problem is not that Christians lack instruction, but that these two forms of knowing have drifted apart?
People may explicitly believe God is good and present, while implicitly expecting distance, disappointment, or silence. They may affirm Jesus’ teachings, while instinctively trusting control, productivity, or self-protection when the stakes are high.
If this is true, then discipleship has not failed because belief collapsed, but because trust was never fully trained.
A gospel trusted only partway
It also seems worth asking whether the gospel many of us have learned to trust has been subtly narrowed.
What if salvation has been framed primarily as forgiveness and future hope, while transformation and present participation were assumed rather than practiced? What if belief was emphasized more clearly than apprenticeship?
Dallas Willard warned that the church had become effective at producing converts while neglecting the formation of disciples. Not because leaders were careless, but because formation was treated as secondary to belief.
In that environment, Jesus can quietly become the one who secures heaven later, rather than the one who teaches us how to live under God’s reign now.
The gospel does not become false.
It becomes smaller.
And when the gospel shrinks, formation weakens not through rebellion, but through neglect.
What did Jesus actually announce?
This raises a more fundamental question. What did Jesus mean when He spoke of the Kingdom of God?
“The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent and believe in the gospel” (Mark 1:15, ESV).
If the Kingdom was “at hand,” what kind of life did Jesus believe was available?
Throughout the Gospels, Jesus speaks as if God’s reign is not only future but present. He teaches people to pray for daily provision (Matthew 6:11, ESV), to release anxiety rather than be ruled by it (Matthew 6:25–34, ESV), to forgive in ways that heal rather than harden (Matthew 18:21–35, ESV), and to trust the Father when obedience feels risky.
This does not sound like abstract theology.
It sounds like a way of life.
Jesus’ invitation to discipleship was not primarily informational. It was vocational. “Learn from me,” He said (Matthew 11:29, ESV). Learn how to live. Learn how to trust. Learn how to participate in the life of the Kingdom.
And this learning was never meant to depend on effort alone. Jesus promised the Spirit would dwell within His people, making Kingdom life possible from the inside out (John 14:16–17, ESV). Obedience was not framed as earning, but as participation empowered by presence.
Why imagination may be necessary
If Jesus announced a present and livable Kingdom, another question follows. Why does that Kingdom so often feel abstract, even to sincere believers?
How do people come to trust a way of life deeply enough to live by it?
Here imagination begins to matter. Not as a replacement for discipleship, but as a condition for it.
Imagination shapes plausibility. It trains perception. It helps people recognize what a life under God’s reign might look like in concrete situations and whether such a life can be trusted as good.
James K. A. Smith has argued that human beings are formed less by ideas than by practices and stories that aim their loves. N. T. Wright has emphasized that the Kingdom is not a metaphor but an alternative reality that must be learned and inhabited.
Without imagination, the Kingdom remains a concept.
With imagination, it becomes visible.
Jesus consistently taught this way. Through parables, He invited people to see seeds, fields, meals, and mercy as sites of God’s active reign (Matthew 13:31–33, ESV). He was not avoiding clarity. He was training perception at the level where trust is formed.
Imagination does not replace obedience.
It helps obedience make sense.
Why this series exists
It seems, then, that something vital has been misplaced.
Not belief.
But apprenticeship.
Not doctrine.
But coherence between what we confess and what we trust.
This series exists to explore that gap carefully and faithfully. To ask how the church learned to believe without learning to live, how imagination shapes implicit trust long before arguments arrive, and how orthodox Christianity can recover a compelling, embodied vision of life under God’s reign.
The aim is not louder conviction.
It is deeper formation.
An invitation to attend
Rather than rushing to solutions, this series begins with attention.
Where do your explicit beliefs and your lived expectations quietly diverge? What do you find yourself trusting when pressure rises? What picture of the world seems to guide your instincts?
Jesus is not merely inviting agreement to a set of doctrines.
He is inviting apprenticeship, relationship, and partnership.
Jesus said, “The kingdom of God is in the midst of you” (Luke 17:21, ESV).
It seems the Kingdom may be closer than we have learned to expect.
The Next Step: Leadership Formation through StoryQuest
StoryQuest exists to help leaders and teams rediscover the story they’re living in God’s Kingdom, to see how it aligns (or doesn’t) with God’s story, and to grow into leadership that reflects truth in both character and craft.
Through guided processes and reflection, Leadership Formation through StoryQuest helps Christian leaders live from identity rather than image, and to lead from the true story rather than the distorted ones culture tells.Learn more at:
👉StoryQuest.Consulting
